Is Race Real or a Justification for Superiority?

Essentially, race does not exist.

You may consider your race as a major part of your identification for your entire life, but how would you prove your race to someone? By the color of your skin, hair, and eyes?

    According the Jenée Desmond Haris in a three-minute Vox YouTube video, she explained the myth of race. Johann Friedrich Blumenbach, a German scientist, was one of the first people to attempt to categorize human according to geographical reasons and physical appearances.

              Throughout history, it was common as to someone who might look one way, but identify themselves as another race. Let’s take a look at a research done by Pew Research Center. The research was done over a telephone interview and interviewees were asked to guess the race of their interviewers during the end of the interview. Surprisingly, the analysis of the results shows about a half (49%) mismatch between what the respondents perceived to be the interviewer’s ethnicity and the actual race of the Interviewer (PewResearch.org). This result might be surprising as to how one’s race may be hard to identify based purely on external factors. 

(PewResearch.org)

            Keeping this in mind, let’s look at further findings of Jenée Desmond Haris. She stated the reason as to why many people cannot prove what exact race they are is because “There isn’t a race chromosome in our DNA that people can point to” (Vox.com). She claimed that when the medical community links race to health outcomes such as stating how there is a higher probability of being diagnosed with malaria in Africa. It is not according to your genetic makeup, but to other external factors such as the origins of your ancestors the coincidental higher probability of being diagnosed with a disease.

            However, if this is really true, then why do people still prioritize themselves over others according to external traits. Thus, creating race and racial divisions due to the illusion of superiority. From the American Civil War to the “Black Lives Matter” campaign, race had always been an essential part that had caused many social and political disputes. People fight with and connect with another through race, which does not exist. If so, then is the idea of race just a justification to resolve all contradictions between those who are born free with those who are born enslaved?

            
           Yet, it is saddening how many people urges for the idea of equality between all races and ethnicities. While internally, they unintentionally categorize one another according to their “race”. From the misconception that Asians are known for having straight A’s or being extremely talented at math to the humiliation of Jim Crow. Racial stereotyping is common needs to be ceased. There are no genetic structures that confirms any race to be biologically predisposed to the labels others put on them. It seems to be that the prejudice against certain groups are so embedded in one’s cultural and worldview that it is natural for someone to make racial discrimination statements without second thoughts. Although social issues due to race will probably never come to an end, one must recognize how devastating that people are classifying each other by superficial factors like race when we are all intrinsically the same.

(vox.com)

The Ostracizing of Political Association Based Upon Generalizations

       

        That's a long, wordy title. Let me explain. More and more I see articles about people who lean more to liberal or conservative than his or her demographic, and they are scared to share his or her beliefs because they see others getting ostracized, excluded from everyone else. This is happening because of predetermined stereotypes, like "ALL conservatives are Pro-Life, Pro-Gun, Pro-God" and "ALL liberals are young college millennials who just want money from the government". These assumptions are dangerous. They automatically alienate a massive portion of the population. In an article written by Tom King, a Democrat that is also a very orthodox Christian, presents the fact: One can be a Democrat, but also have traditional religious views and vice-versa that not all Republicans are strict Christians, for example. In these politically troubled times, people seem to forget that identifying with one political party doesn’t necessarily mean that person agrees with every single belief of the party. Something that I was shocked by is the fact that six of seven justices that voted for Roe v. Wade (a case that would legalize abortion), were Republicans. So next time you meet someone with opposing views and values, listen to what they have to say and keep emotion out of it. Then you're allowed to avoid them.

EINTY- The Struggles of Communication

Every family has its problems. I think we all can relate to this statement but just how much? Celeste Ng dives into a particular families issues in her novel Everything I Never Told You. She reveals how lack of communication between parents and their kids can lead to emotional consequences.

In this novel, when Lydia, the family favourite, is found dead the rest of the family is left trying to cope. But before Lydia was found dead this family still had many problems. It all started when Marilyn and James first married and made a pact, “To let the past drift away, to stop asking questions, to look forward from then on, never back” (Ng 49). This changed the way they lived, talked to each other, and raised their kids. They never tell their kids about what they went through in school, how Marilyn experienced sexism and how James experienced racism. This causes their kids to believe their parents don’t understand what they are going through during the school day. So, instead of confiding in their parents, Nath, Lydia and Hannah close themselves off—not having a healthy outlet to talk to.

Lydia was also HEAVILY favored by her parents, while her siblings, Nath and Hannah, were ignored.

Marilyn and James focused all their time on Lydia, working extremely hard to make sure Lydia would not have the same childhood that they had. Marilyn wants for Lydia to be a successful, independent woman while James wants Lydia to be popular and have asocial life.  Parents putting pressure on their kids is normal, but Marilyn and James push Lydia an unreasonable amount. Ng communicates this weird family dynamic when she writes about James buying Lydia a book on, “How to Win Friends and Influence People” (Ng 175). James does not tell Lydia how he understands what it’s like to be the only Asian at a school, or how all he wants is for Lydia to have more of a social life than he did. And because James doesn’t say any of this to Lydia, she is left offended and hurt.

All the characters in the novel have so much to say, yet they don’t know how to say it. Ng portrays this exceptionally in Everything I Never Told You. She writes from different characters perspectives showing us what each character is thinking—but not saying. Ng reveals just how much lack of communication between parents and their children can create an unhealthy environment for the kids to grow up in. Her effective writing caused me to think about family dynamics and unnecessary pressures that parents put on their kids. Everything I Never Told You relates so much to modern day families and parent-child dynamics. Her interesting storyline following a mixed race family, along with her writing style creates an engaging and eye opening story, which I really enjoyed.

Decided career?

Who cares about your interests? Your path was already chosen by your parents since birth. “You shouldn't choose a career path because you love it; you choose a career and learn to like it.” The different opinions between children and parents brings up the controversial question: Do you or your parents choose your future?

According to a study done, the top three jobs parents wanted their children to be were engineers, doctors, and scientists. Therefore, the fear children face of disappointing their parents, lead most of them to give up their dreams. Unfortunately, the few students who stick up for themselves and refuse to follow their "chosen path," are considered disobedient.

In the short story "Two Kinds" by Amy Tan, Jing-Mei faces the same problem as well. Fighting against her mother's thoughts on obedient vs disobedient child, she refuses to be her mother's "source of pride." Jing-Mei takes a different stance and strongly agrees with the statement: “A disobedient child does not describe a person resisting from being a someone other than themselves.”

Sometimes, disobedience is the key to discovering who you are as a person. "Your parents know best" may not always be necessarily true. Students! It may be important to please your parents but please do not forget who you are. 

Students Beware: 3 Consequences of Your Parents' High Expectations

Picture this: it's 1:00 am. Your face is basking in the soft glow of the computer screen. Your history paper, which is due tomorrow, remains incomplete, but the mere though of the your parents seeing anything under a 90 pushes you to keep your eyes open. Sound familiar? It's safe to say that most parents want their children to be happy and successful. Their high expectations are made with only good intentions in mind. However, this may not be the best way encourage academic success.

A recent novel titled Everything I Never Told You helps portray the difficulty faced by many pressured adolescents. Author Celeste Ng details the downward spiral of teenage girl Lydia Lee as she deals with her parents pressure for success as well as how both her parents experiences and her own lead to her eventual suicide. (I highly suggest you give it a read! For a more detailed book review, click here.) As outlined in the story, there are three main outcomes from situations such as this one.

1. Feeling Overwhelmed

Stress is unavoidable. It is normal to feel a overwhelmed every now and then, but it becomes a problem when it starts to interfere with daily life. The issue with academic pressure is that it is hard for students to stand up to their parents when it becomes to much. Lydia's fear of disappointing her mother prevents her from saying no to her mother's constant push to excel.

2. Loss of Self Identity and Goals

Adolescence is time of self discovery and finding a path in life. However, this natural process can be seriously tampered with when parents try to fit their child into a mold of what they feel is the perfect student. Similar to this, Lydia's mother was not able to achieve her own goals, and as a result, she forced those dreams onto her daughter.

3. Neglect of Other Siblings

High academic pressure being placed on you may backfire on both you and your siblings. The constant focus on one student can mean that other children do not receive the same amount of support and attention, often resulting in jealously, low self-esteem, and erratical behavior. For example, Lydia's two siblings were constantly neglected as their parents increasingly focused on Lydia's success. Obviously, if you are a single child, this doesn't really apply to you directly. However, a parent's own ambitions and relationships can also be affected.

The effects of academic pressure are not just limited to these concrete effects. Much more serious consequences can also occur. Children with parents who put immense value on achievement have been proven to experience depression and anxiety, making it less likely more then to excel in the end. (If you want to read more in detail on the psychological impact, click here.)

If you happen to find yourself facing similar struggles, remember that communication is the first step in resolving any issue with family. Understand that your parents want to see you happy and successful, but make sure to explain how their parenting strategy may not be working in your best interest. Ultimately, not every parent will lay off of achievements, but that's not the end of the world. Just keep in mind that the most important thing is that you are satisfied with your successes (while making sure that's not based on the values of your parents) and choose a path in life that makes you the happiest. (This doesn't mean you should stop studying though!)

Serial is Cereal to Your Brain

Sarah Koenig, the author of the acclaimed podcast, Serial, knows how to keep you on your toes. But what makes her work so intriguing? Well, a couple things. For starters, the content of the podcast is something that weighs heavy in anyone’s heart, murder. But what makes HER way of telling it so juicy and keeping the listener compelled to come back for more. Well, many people admire the fact they’re able to hear a human voice; Adnan, the convicted murderer, along with others that played a role in the ongoing mystery show up countless times throughout the series. It gives the listener a sense of connection that is partially lost through just words. To go along with the peodcast medium, Koenig’s personality and charisma is perfect for the role she takes on. I fell in love with her merely by how she spoke (figuratively speaking of course). Well the point I’m trying to make with all this is, using a variety of mediums besides plain paper text enhance learning to a whole new level. Don’t just be bogged down by words, explore the other ways you can obtain information and find the one that keeps you engaged and sticks to your brain like gum under a seat hours, days, even months after you walk away from it. Don’t be afraid to expand the mind a little.

Russo

Fire or Ice?

Fire or Ice: Does it Really Matter?

The English poet Robert Frost once wrote a pithy poem on how the end of the world would come-either in fire or ice.

                              Fire and Ice 

BY ROBERT FROST

Some say the world will end in fire,
Some say in ice.
From what I’ve tasted of desire
I hold with those who favor fire.
But if it had to perish twice,
I think I know enough of hate
To say that for destruction ice
Is also great
And would suffice. 

Not surprisingly, in the poem, people start taking sides. In real life, like how people cannot agree on whether the apocalypse should happen in fire or ice, people debate about everything. Let's talk about poems here: People do not come to an agreement on whether long poems or short poems are better. 

In poetry, there are very long works, epics-The Odyssey and The Iliad by Homer, The Divine Comedy by Dante, and the Sumerian Gilgamesh; there are also some other pieces, shorter than these, but still comparatively long, "The Raven," by Edgar Allan Poe, for instance, and there are plenty of short- almost pithy works(most poems studied at schools are) like “Fire and Ice.”

"Long" vs. "Short"

Now, take another look at this criteria used to compare poetries-the two adjectives for length-"long" and "short." What is considered "long" and what is considered "short?" Are twenty words short? Fifty? Maybe a three hundred? Sure, "The Raven" is pretty long. What about the Odyssey then? Well, the thing is, there is not a definite boundary between the two. Quantifying the length of poems to judge them seems pretty logical, but it is as absurd as measuring how many drops of water there are in two mugs and comparing them to each other. 

How do we compare two poems? We can't. If you were to compare the water in a mug to the water in a pool, it wouldn't make sense for you to choose the pool when you are thirsty, and the pool is clearly the better option if you want to swim.

You get the metaphor right?

Going back to the poem “Fire and Ice”, rather than persuading the readers to pick a side, Frost wanted his audience to consider the subjectivity of their opinions. Whether it is in scorch or in shivers, whether you like it or not, there will be nothing left in the end anyways. Subjectively, your feelings and emotions make a difference on the experience that is objectively the same. Fire or ice does not matter. It is like when your dentist ask you what anesthesia you want-strawberry or banana-regardless of what you choose, you are well-aware that you would have your tooth pulled out eventually.